Malcolm X vs. Skins essays

Malcolm X vs. Skins essays Though the films Malcolm X and Skins are produced by different people at different times, they have some similarities. Although neither film is a documentary both films show great detail no matter what type of stereotype both films would get by viewers. Documentaries serve their purpose, but they can often set the tone as these are people studied from an outside perspective rather than this would be ones family if one lived there. To really communicate across cultures both kinds of films are needed, and that is why these two are great films. The character traits, religion differences, and overall lifestyles are in some ways similar throughout the films. It is debated by reviewers rather Director Spike Lee altered some of Malcolm Xs history to make a more entertaining movie. Others feel that the civil rights leader was the embodiment of evil and was undeserving of this filmed tribute. Nevertheless, no film is perfect and no docudrama is historically accurate, but Malcolm X is totally engrossing from start to finish. The imagery helps bring the conflict, drive and sincerity of Malcolm X to life. In the movie, it becomes so obvious that Malcolm had just reached a kind of Buddhist nirvana in his Islamic faith. Had he been allowed to live, his newly found spiritual insight gained from his pilgrimage to Mecca most likely would have helped to enlighten other Americans, Muslim or Christian, white or black. Malcolm appears on the verge of something even greater than he had previously been. Malcolm appears to be on the verge of becoming a national and perhaps even global spiritual and secular leader at the time of his death. Skins could almost be called a documentary, but it would not have been better treated as one. Through the film, the truth of life in Pine Ridge is revealed in a way that enables it to be shown in a feature film to the mass public, to those who woul ...